Stevenson v. Director, TDCJ-CID

N.D. Texas

Stevenson v. Director, TDCJ-CID

DecidedOctober 28, 2020

Docket3:20-cv-01645

StatusUnknown

This text of Stevenson v. Director, TDCJ-CID (Stevenson v. Director, TDCJ-CID) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stevenson v. Director, TDCJ-CID, (N.D. Tex. 2020).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION DONALD STEVENSON, ) ID # 1825829, ) Petitioner, ) ) vs. ) No. 3:20-CV-1645-D ) DIRECTOR, Texas Department of Criminal ) Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, _) ) Respondent. ) ORDER After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct, and they are adopted as the findings and conclusions of the court. For the reasons stated in the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, movant’s successive petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is TRANSFERRED to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit under Henderson vy. Haro, 282 F.3d 862, 864 (5th Cir. 2002), and In re Epps, 127 F.3d 364, 365 (5th Cir. 1997), by separate judgment. SO ORDERED. October 28, 2020.

Sioned A. FITZWA i SENIOR JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION DONALD STEVENSON, ) ID # 1825829, ) Petitioner, ) ) vs. ) No. 3:20-CV-1645-D ) DIRECTOR, Texas Department of Criminal ) Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, _) ) Respondent. ) ORDER After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct, and they are adopted as the findings and conclusions of the court. For the reasons stated in the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, movant’s successive petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is TRANSFERRED to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit under Henderson vy. Haro, 282 F.3d 862, 864 (5th Cir. 2002), and In re Epps, 127 F.3d 364, 365 (5th Cir. 1997), by separate judgment. SO ORDERED. October 28, 2020.

Sioned A. FITZWA i SENIOR JUDGE

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Stevenson v. Director, TDCJ-CID, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stevenson-v-director-tdcj-cid-txnd-2020.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack