Stevenson v. Cox
This text of Stevenson v. Cox (Stevenson v. Cox) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
pro se plaintiffs are not excused from holding a case conference). Given these undisputed facts, 1 the district court was within its discretion when it found that compelling and extraordinary circumstances did not exist to justify an extension of NRCP 16.1(e)'s 180-day time frame We therefore ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.
arraguirre
Douglas
OnnA, J.
cc: Hon. Jim C. Shirley, District Judge Ronald Alex Stevenson Attorney General/Carson City Pershing County Clerk
'Because these facts were undisputed, they were not "contentions" needing the support of an affidavit under DCR 13(6).
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A es.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Stevenson v. Cox, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stevenson-v-cox-nev-2015.