Stevenson v. Bruce

10 Ind. 397
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedJune 17, 1858
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 10 Ind. 397 (Stevenson v. Bruce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stevenson v. Bruce, 10 Ind. 397 (Ind. 1858).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Thomas W. Stevenson, and John Green, guardian of Cosmo A. Stev.enson, a minor, leased to Charles Bruce a house and lot in Logansport, for five years, at 150 dollars a year. Bruce subleased the premises to another person, for four years and nine months, at 200 dollars a year.

Stevenson and Green refused to give possession to Bruce, or the sublessee. Bruce sued them for damages, and recovered 250 dollars. The Court rendered the judgment as. against Green, to be levied of the effects of his ward, Cos-mo A. Stevenson. Pending the suit, Green resigned his [398]*398guardianship, and was offered as a witness for his co-defendant, but he was rejected.

D. D. Pratt and S. C. Taber, for the appellants.

A suit against a guardian upon a contract made by him touching his ward’s estate, is personal against the guardian, and not against him in his fiduciary capacity. Hence, he could not, in this case, by resigning, cease to be a party to the suit. His rejection as a witness was, consequently, correct. It follows, also, that the direction in the judgment, to levy it of the ward’s effects, is error. Clark v. Casler, 1 Ind. R. 243.

As to the damages, we cannot say, under the evidence, that they are excessive — perhaps they might have been a few dollars less, but we are not at liberty to interfere, for this reason, with the verdict.

The error in the form of rendering the judgment may be considered as amended in this Court.

The judgment is affirmed, with 1 per cent, damages and costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Payne v. Rech
6 Ohio App. 327 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1917)
Lothrop v. Duffield
96 N.W. 577 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1903)
Hall v. Ferguson
57 N.E. 153 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1900)
Miller v. Hart
34 N.E. 1003 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1893)
Turner v. Flagg
33 N.E. 1104 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1893)
Baker v. Groves
27 N.E. 640 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1891)
State ex rel. Dorman v. Fitch
16 N.E. 396 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1888)
Fillmore v. Wells
10 Colo. 228 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1887)
Elson v. Spraker
100 Ind. 374 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1885)
Garrigus v. Ellis
95 Ind. 598 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1884)
Bowen v. Bragunier
88 Ind. 558 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1882)
McKinney v. Jones
11 N.W. 606 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1882)
Matlock's Adm'r v. Straughn
21 Ind. 128 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1863)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 Ind. 397, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stevenson-v-bruce-ind-1858.