Stevenson v. Brod-Dugan Paint and Wallcoverings

Eighth Circuit

Stevenson v. Brod-Dugan Paint and Wallcoverings

149 F.3d 1188, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 22467, 1998 WL 279351

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedJune 2, 1998

Docket97-4026

StatusUnpublished

This text of 149 F.3d 1188 (Stevenson v. Brod-Dugan Paint and Wallcoverings) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stevenson v. Brod-Dugan Paint and Wallcoverings, 149 F.3d 1188, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 22467, 1998 WL 279351 (8th Cir. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

149 F.3d 1188

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that they are not precedent and generally should not be cited unless relevant to establishing the doctrines of res judicata, collateral estoppel, the law of the case, or if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue and no published opinion would serve as well.
Willie J. STEVENSON, Appellant,
v.
BROD-DUGAN PAINT AND WALLCOVERINGS; Robert Brod; Jack
Bergen; Sam Sockolowski; Dwaynn Patterson; Local
604, International Brotherhood of
Painters and Allied Trades, Appellees.

No. 97-4026.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted May 29, 1998.
Filed June 2, 1998.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri.

Before McMILLIAN, LOKEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Willie J. Stevenson appeals from the district court's1 adverse rulings and dismissal of his employment discrimination complaint. After careful review of the record and the parties' briefs, we reject as meritless Stevenson's challenges to the district court's rulings on discovery, recusal, and appointment of counsel; and we affirm the dismissal of Stevenson's claims against all of the appellees for the reasons stated by the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

The HONORABLE STEPHEN N. LIMBAUGH, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

149 F.3d 1188

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that they are not precedent and generally should not be cited unless relevant to establishing the doctrines of res judicata, collateral estoppel, the law of the case, or if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue and no published opinion would serve as well.
Willie J. STEVENSON, Appellant,
v.
BROD-DUGAN PAINT AND WALLCOVERINGS; Robert Brod; Jack
Bergen; Sam Sockolowski; Dwaynn Patterson; Local
604, International Brotherhood of
Painters and Allied Trades, Appellees.

No. 97-4026.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted May 29, 1998.
Filed June 2, 1998.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri.

Before McMILLIAN, LOKEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Willie J. Stevenson appeals from the district court's1 adverse rulings and dismissal of his employment discrimination complaint. After careful review of the record and the parties' briefs, we reject as meritless Stevenson's challenges to the district court's rulings on discovery, recusal, and appointment of counsel; and we affirm the dismissal of Stevenson's claims against all of the appellees for the reasons stated by the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

The HONORABLE STEPHEN N. LIMBAUGH, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

149 F.3d 1188, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 22467, 1998 WL 279351, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stevenson-v-brod-dugan-paint-and-wallcoverings-ca8-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack