Stevenson v. BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD
718 N.W.2d 329, 476 Mich. 859
This text of 718 N.W.2d 329 (Stevenson v. BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Stevenson v. BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD, 718 N.W.2d 329, 476 Mich. 859 (Mich. 2006).
Opinion
Mitchell STEVENSON and Bethany Stevenson, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD, Intervening-Plaintiff, and
Michael A. Nizzi, D.O. and Munson Medical Center, Defendants-Appellees.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 10, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
People v. Ray
718 N.W.2d 329 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2006)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
718 N.W.2d 329, 476 Mich. 859, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stevenson-v-blue-cross-blue-shield-mich-2006.