Stevenson v. Black ex rel. Gabler

1 A. 312, 1 Sadler 117
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedOctober 19, 1885
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 1 A. 312 (Stevenson v. Black ex rel. Gabler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stevenson v. Black ex rel. Gabler, 1 A. 312, 1 Sadler 117 (Pa. 1885).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The construction given in Nicholas v. Phelps, 15 Pa. 36, to § 25 of the act of February 24, 1834, has been acquiesced in for thirty-five years. We are not aware that its correctness has been questioned in this court during all that time. If the statute was now before us for the first time, its proper construction would be a fair question for argument. This, however, does not justify us in now disturbing that which has been recognized as a correct construction for so many years. Titles have passed and been acquired in reliance on its correctness. We recognize it as the law of this commonwealth and adhere to it accordingly. It rules this case.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harvey v. Nelson, Lanphier & Co.
31 La. 434 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1879)
Wilkins v. Gillis & Ferguson
20 La. 538 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1868)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 A. 312, 1 Sadler 117, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stevenson-v-black-ex-rel-gabler-pa-1885.