Stevenson v. Benjamin

District Court, M.D. Louisiana·Decided January 22, 2021·No. 3:19-cv-00637·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

CHRISTOPHER STEVENSON (#509582) CIVIL ACTION

VERSUS 19-637-BAJ-SDJ KEVIN BENJAMIN, ET AL.

ORDER Before the Court is the plaintiff’s Motion (R. Doc. 77) wherein the plaintiff requests that a federal investigation be commenced with regards to the course of the proceedings in this matter. The Court finds no authority for such a request under the circumstances in this civil matter.1 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the plaintiff’s Motion (R. Doc. 77) is DENIED. Signed in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, on January 22, 2021.

S

SCOTT D. JOHNSON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

1 To the extent the plaintiff is requesting injunctive relief, the plaintiff must establish: (1) a substantial likelihood of prevailing on the merits; (2) a substantial threat of irreparable injury if the injunction is not granted; (3) the threatened injury outweighs any harm that will result to the non-movant if the injunction is granted; and (4) the injunction will not disserve the public interest. See Ridgely v. Fed. Emergency Mgmt. Agency, 512 F.3d 727, 734 (5th Cir. 2008). The plaintiff has not addressed any of the aforementioned factors in his Motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stevenson v. Benjamin, (M.D. La. 2021).

Stevenson v. Benjamin (Stevenson v. Benjamin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ridgely v. Federal Emergency Management Agency
512 F.3d 727 (Fifth Circuit, 2008)