Stevenson v. Benjamin
This text of Stevenson v. Benjamin (Stevenson v. Benjamin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, M.D. Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
CHRISTOPHER STEVENSON (#509582) CIVIL ACTION
VERSUS 19-637-BAJ-SDJ KEVIN BENJAMIN, ET AL.
ORDER Before the Court is the plaintiff’s Motion (R. Doc. 77) wherein the plaintiff requests that a federal investigation be commenced with regards to the course of the proceedings in this matter. The Court finds no authority for such a request under the circumstances in this civil matter.1 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the plaintiff’s Motion (R. Doc. 77) is DENIED. Signed in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, on January 22, 2021.
S
SCOTT D. JOHNSON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
1 To the extent the plaintiff is requesting injunctive relief, the plaintiff must establish: (1) a substantial likelihood of prevailing on the merits; (2) a substantial threat of irreparable injury if the injunction is not granted; (3) the threatened injury outweighs any harm that will result to the non-movant if the injunction is granted; and (4) the injunction will not disserve the public interest. See Ridgely v. Fed. Emergency Mgmt. Agency, 512 F.3d 727, 734 (5th Cir. 2008). The plaintiff has not addressed any of the aforementioned factors in his Motion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Stevenson v. Benjamin, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stevenson-v-benjamin-lamd-2021.