Stevenson v. Beecker

1 Johns. 492
New York Supreme Court·Decided August 15, 1806·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The submission to referees was in nature of an arbitration. The case does not appear to be such as required the examination of long accounts, or proper to be referred under the act. It comes, therefore, within the reason of our decision of Miller & Underhill v. Vaughan.* There is no pretence of misbehaviour in the referees, and the parties having agreed that their report should b.‘ conclusive, they must abide by it. We give no opinion on the merits.

Rule granted.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stevenson v. Beecker, 1 Johns. 492 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1806).

1 Johns. 492 (Stevenson v. Beecker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McCleary v. McCleary
37 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 154 (New York Supreme Court, 1883)