Stevenson v. Barbour
140 U.S. 48, 11 S. Ct. 690, 35 L. Ed. 338, 1891 U.S. LEXIS 2429
Opinion
No assignment of errors accompanies the transcript of record in this case, nor is there any specification of the errors relied on in the brief of counsel for plaintiff in error. Moreover, the record presents no question of law calling for the exercise of our right of review. Fishburn v. Railway Co., 137 U . S. 60; Pacific Express Co. v. Malin, 132 U. S. 531, 538.
The judgment is Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stevenson v. Barbour, 140 U.S. 48, 11 S. Ct. 690, 35 L. Ed. 338, 1891 U.S. LEXIS 2429 (1891).
140 U.S. 48 (Stevenson v. Barbour) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hanson v. C. B. & Q. R. R.
213 P. 763 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1923)