Stevenson v. Bannan

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Stevenson v. Bannan

76 A. 214, 227 Pa. 498, 1910 Pa. LEXIS 692

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 15, 1910·No. Appeal, No. 353·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

March 21, 1910:

The terms of the agreement on which the action is founded are not clear, but it appears from them that it was the intention of the parties that the plaintiff should procure a buyer, not that he should be paid a commission in any event. The order of the court discharging the plaintiff’s rule for judgment is affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of Judge Shay.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

March 21, 1910:

The terms of the agreement on which the action is founded are not clear, but it appears from them that it was the intention of the parties that the plaintiff should procure a buyer, not that he should be paid a commission in any event. The order of the court discharging the plaintiff’s rule for judgment is affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of Judge Shay.

Stevenson v. Bannan, 76 A. 214, 227 Pa. 498, 1910 Pa. LEXIS 692 (Pa. 1910).

Pincite

76 A. 214 (Stevenson v. Bannan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related