Stevenson v. Attorney General's Office
This text of 23 Ct. Cl. 43 (Stevenson v. Attorney General's Office) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This claim was submitted for decision based upon the allegations in the Notice of Claim and respondent's Answer.
Claimant seeks payment in the amount of $11,706.13 for travel expenses incurred as an employee of respondent. Respondent, in its Answer, admits the validity of the claim, but states that there were insufficient funds in its appropriation for the fiscal year in question from which to pay the claim.
While the Court believes that this is a claim which in equity and good conscience should be paid, the Court further believes that an award cannot be recommended based upon the decision in Airkem Sales and Service, et al. vs. Dept. of [44]*44Mental Health, 8 Ct. Cl. 180 (1971).
Claim disallowed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
23 Ct. Cl. 43, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stevenson-v-attorney-generals-office-wvctcl-1999.