Stevens v. Yeatman
19 Md. 480, 1863 Md. LEXIS 12
Opinion
delivered, the opinion of this Court:
The only question for our consideration, in this case, is, did the Circuit Court err in finally ratifying and confirm[490] ing the auditor’s report, by the order of the 'itlr day of February 1860?
After a careful review of the bill, answer and depositions, we see no just reason to disturb’the above order; and for the reasons assigned by tire learned Judge wlro passed that order, the same will be affirmed.
Order affirmed, with costs to appellee in this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stevens v. Yeatman, 19 Md. 480, 1863 Md. LEXIS 12 (Md. 1863).
19 Md. 480 (Stevens v. Yeatman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mattingly v. Mattingly
607 A.2d 575 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1992)
McDonough v. Saunders
78 So. 160 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1917)