Stevens v. Wilson

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 3, 2009
Docket08-7587
StatusUnpublished

This text of Stevens v. Wilson (Stevens v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stevens v. Wilson, (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7587

DAVID STEVENS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

ERNEST WILSON; SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; RIDGEVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief District Judge. (0:07-cv-03590-JFA)

Submitted: May 28, 2009 Decided: June 3, 2009

Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Stevens, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

David Stevens appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendations of the magistrate judge and

dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006)

complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. Stevens v. Wilson, No. 0:07-cv-03590-JFA

(D.S.C. filed July 29, 2008 & entered July 30, 2008). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Stevens v. Wilson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stevens-v-wilson-ca4-2009.