Stevens v. Wilson
This text of Stevens v. Wilson (Stevens v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7587
DAVID STEVENS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ERNEST WILSON; SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; RIDGEVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief District Judge. (0:07-cv-03590-JFA)
Submitted: May 28, 2009 Decided: June 3, 2009
Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David Stevens, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
David Stevens appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendations of the magistrate judge and
dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006)
complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Stevens v. Wilson, No. 0:07-cv-03590-JFA
(D.S.C. filed July 29, 2008 & entered July 30, 2008). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Stevens v. Wilson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stevens-v-wilson-ca4-2009.