Stevens v. Wilson

Fourth Circuit

Stevens v. Wilson

326 F. App'x 241

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 3, 2009·No. No. 08-7587·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

David Stevens appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendations of the magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Stevens v. Wilson, No. 0:07-cv-03590-JFA (D.S.C. filed July 29, 2008 & entered July 30, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

David Stevens appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendations of the magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Stevens v. Wilson, No. 0:07-cv-03590-JFA (D.S.C. filed July 29, 2008 & entered July 30, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Stevens v. Wilson, 326 F. App'x 241 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

326 F. App'x 241 (Stevens v. Wilson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related