Stevens v. Warden

202 A.2d 598, 235 Md. 684, 1964 Md. LEXIS 834
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedJuly 30, 1964
Docket[App. No. 7, September Term, 1964 (Adv.).]
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 202 A.2d 598 (Stevens v. Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stevens v. Warden, 202 A.2d 598, 235 Md. 684, 1964 Md. LEXIS 834 (Md. 1964).

Opinion

235 Md. 684 (1964)
202 A.2d 598

STEVENS
v.
WARDEN OF THE MARYLAND PENITENTIARY

[App. No. 7, September Term, 1964 (Adv.).]

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided July 30, 1964.

The cause was argued before BRUNE, C.J., and HENDERSON, HAMMOND, PRESCOTT, HORNEY, MARBURY and SYBERT, JJ.

PER CURIAM:

The application of Samuel T. Stevens, Jr., for leave to appeal from the order denying him post conviction relief from his imprisonment for armed robbery is hereby denied for the reasons stated in the memorandum filed by Judge Byrnes in the lower court, except that the twelfth contention for relief should have been denied because the mere allegation, without stating any particulars, that the State suppressed vital witnesses was insufficient to support such claim and afforded no basis for the relief sought. We may add that the second contention — that his court-appointed trial counsel was incompetent — which was not referred to in the lower court's memorandum had already been *685 raised on direct appeal and decided adversely to him in Stevens v. State, 230 Md. 47.

Application denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tucker v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary
220 A.2d 908 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
202 A.2d 598, 235 Md. 684, 1964 Md. LEXIS 834, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stevens-v-warden-md-1964.