Stevens v. Unknown Name Employee(s) of U.S. Postal Service
This text of 533 F. App'x 348 (Stevens v. Unknown Name Employee(s) of U.S. Postal Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Tommy Lee Stevens appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reopen his case. The court previously dismissed his civil action as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Stevens v. Unknown Name Emp. of United States Postal Serv., No. 5:12-cv-00451-D (E.D.N.C. Apr. 18, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
533 F. App'x 348, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stevens-v-unknown-name-employees-of-us-postal-service-ca4-2013.