Stevens v. Unknown Name Employee(s) of U.S. Postal Service

533 F. App'x 348
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 22, 2013·No. No. 13-1564·Published

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Tommy Lee Stevens appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reopen his case. The court previously dismissed his civil action as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Stevens v. Unknown Name Emp. of United States Postal Serv., No. 5:12-cv-00451-D (E.D.N.C. Apr. 18, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stevens v. Unknown Name Employee(s) of U.S. Postal Service, 533 F. App'x 348 (4th Cir. 2013).

533 F. App'x 348 (Stevens v. Unknown Name Employee(s) of U.S. Postal Service) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Proceedings in forma pauperis
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)