Stevens v. Times Plaza Development

180 A.D.2d 679

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Volume Flowers, Inc., d/b/a Midtown Florist Nursery and Greenhouse, appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vaccaro, J.), dated March 5, 1990, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as it is asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs to [680]*680the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the appellant’s motion for summary judgment. There remain material questions of fact necessitating a trial (see, Rocovich v Consolidated Edison Co., 78 NY2d 509; Pouso v City of New York, 177 AD2d 560; Copertino v Ward, 100 AD2d 565, 566-567). Thompson, J. P., Harwood, Rosenblatt and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stevens v. Times Plaza Development, 180 A.D.2d 679 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

180 A.D.2d 679 (Stevens v. Times Plaza Development) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rocovich v. Consolidated Edison Co.
583 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1991)
Copertino v. Ward
100 A.D.2d 565 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Pouso v. City of New York
177 A.D.2d 560 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)