Stevens v. Stevens

125 Misc. 451, 211 N.Y.S. 192, 1925 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 904
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 14, 1925
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 125 Misc. 451 (Stevens v. Stevens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stevens v. Stevens, 125 Misc. 451, 211 N.Y.S. 192, 1925 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 904 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1925).

Opinion

Tompkins, J.:

The defendant admits his abandonment of the plaintiff without good cause in law, and does not defend this action or contest the plaintiff’s right to a separation decree and the questions of alimony and counsel fee are the only matters in issue. It follows as a matter of law, from the fact that plaintiff is entitled to a judgment of separation, that the defendant must make reasonable provision for her support, notwithstanding the fact that plaintiff has property of her own. The decisions cited by defendant’s counsel were on motions for temporary alimony and counsel fees pending the trial of the actions. A final judgment in a wife’s favor, because of the misconduct of the husband, does not reheve him of his legal obligation to contribute toward the support of his wife, even though she may have enough property and money to support herself for a while. Plaintiff’s possessions consist of the real property upon which she resides, the taxes, repairs, insurance and upkeep of which she must pay. Her money and personal property are not enough to produce an income sufficient for her support. Indeed, after paying the taxes and other expense of maintaining the real estate and keéping it in repair and suitable condition for her use, there will be little, if anything, left for the plaintiff’s ordinary living expenses. A large part of her personal property was earped by her own industry and work outside of her home, while she and the defendant were living together, the plaintiff, at the same time, taking care of their home and doing the household work. Besides, she very materially aided her husband in his various enterprises and contributed much to his business success. In view of these facts it would be inequitable to require the plaintiff to spend her principal for her support and relieve the defendant of the obligation that rests upon him to make reasonable provision therefor. The defendant is worth approximately $90,000 and is engaged in a profitable business with an annual income of $8,000 or $9,000 and with no one dependent upon him for support except the plaintiff.

Defendant should pay $50 per week from the date of the commencement of this action for the support of the plaintiff and a counsel fee of $350, together with the taxable costs and disbursements of this action.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stevens v. Stevens
214 A.D. 785 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
125 Misc. 451, 211 N.Y.S. 192, 1925 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 904, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stevens-v-stevens-nysupct-1925.