Stevens v. Stevens

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Stevens v. Stevens

408 So. 2d 745, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 18925

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 12, 1982

DocketNo. 81-357

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 408 So. 2d 745 (Stevens v. Stevens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stevens v. Stevens, 408 So. 2d 745, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 18925 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We find no error or abuse of discretion has been demonstrated by the appellant with respect to the trial judge’s rulings which (a) limited evidence at the hearing to the three issues remaining for disposition pursuant to the parties’ stipulation to the division of jointly owned real properties; (b) ordered the wife to pay the husband his share of the net proceeds from the sale of the Varela Street property; and (c) denied the wife alimony and attorneys fees. Quick v. Leatherman, 96 So.2d 136 (Fla. 1957); Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla. 1980). No reversible error having been demonstrated, the final judgment under review is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We find no error or abuse of discretion has been demonstrated by the appellant with respect to the trial judge’s rulings which (a) limited evidence at the hearing to the three issues remaining for disposition pursuant to the parties’ stipulation to the division of jointly owned real properties; (b) ordered the wife to pay the husband his share of the net proceeds from the sale of the Varela Street property; and (c) denied the wife alimony and attorneys fees. Quick v. Leatherman, 96 So.2d 136 (Fla. 1957); Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla. 1980). No reversible error having been demonstrated, the final judgment under review is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

408 So. 2d 745, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 18925, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stevens-v-stevens-fladistctapp-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack