Stevens v. Stevens

31 Colo. 188
Supreme Court of Colorado·Decided January 15, 1903·No. No. 4647·Published·Cited by 19 cases

Opinions

Mr. Justice Gabbert

delivered the opinion of the court.

By virtue of the general equity powers of a court granting a divorce, as well as by virtue of the provision of sec. 9 of the Divorce Act, Session Laws, 1893, p. 240, such court has the authority to modify the decree relative to alimony payable in the future, and the custody and control of minor children as the changed circumstances of the parties may render necessary and just.—Richmond v. Richmond, 2 N. J. E. 90; Sheafe v. Sheafe, 36 N. H. 155; Coad v. Coad, 41 Wis. 23; Foote v. Foote, 22 Ills. 425.

There are no decisions of this court or the court of appeals to the contrary. The judgment of the county court is reversed, and the cause remanded, [190] with directions to overrule the demurrer to the petition. Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stevens v. Stevens, 31 Colo. 188 (Colo. 1903).

31 Colo. 188 (Stevens v. Stevens) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Watson v. Watson
310 P.2d 554 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1957)
Zook v. Zook
195 P.2d 387 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1948)
Zlaten v. Zlaten
186 P.2d 583 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1947)
Hall v. Hall
97 P.2d 415 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1939)
Gourley v. Gourley
73 P.2d 1375 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1937)
Weydeveld v. Weydeveld
67 P.2d 72 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1937)
Duvall v. Duvall
32 P.2d 842 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1934)
Walton v. Walton
278 P. 780 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1929)
Sullivan v. Sullivan
111 So. 911 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1927)
Weston v. Weston
251 P. 534 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1926)
Diegel v. Diegel
215 P. 143 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1923)
Jewel v. Jewel
207 P. 991 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1922)
Ruge v. Ruge
165 P. 1063 (Washington Supreme Court, 1917)
Prewitt v. Prewitt
56 Colo. 174 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1914)
Kapp v. District Court of the Seventh Judicial District
31 Nev. 444 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1909)
Hunt v. Monroe
91 P. 269 (Utah Supreme Court, 1907)
Graham v. Graham
38 Colo. 453 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1906)