Stevens v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Stevens v. State

272 S.W.3d 344, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1423, 2008 WL 4635432

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 21, 2008·No. ED 90971·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mary Stevens (“Movant”) appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying her motions to vacate, set aside or correct sentence and judgment pursuant to Rule 24.035 for two criminal cases.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mary Stevens (“Movant”) appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying her motions to vacate, set aside or correct sentence and judgment pursuant to Rule 24.035 for two criminal cases.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Stevens v. State, 272 S.W.3d 344, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1423, 2008 WL 4635432 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

272 S.W.3d 344 (Stevens v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related