Stevens v. State
880 So. 2d 784, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 8946, 2004 WL 1415644
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Stevens v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 823 So. 2d 319 →
Opinion
Affirmed. See McCall v. State, 862 So.2d 807 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); Cook v. State, 816 So.2d 773 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Wright v. State, 834 So.2d 879 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002); LaMar v. State, 823 So.2d 231 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); Middleton v. State, 721 So.2d 792 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998). As this court did in McCall, we certify direct conflict with Richardson v. State, — So.2d -, 28 Fla. L. Weekly D1716 (Fla. 4th DCA July 23, 2003).
Affirmed; conflict certified.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stevens v. State, 880 So. 2d 784, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 8946, 2004 WL 1415644 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).
880 So. 2d 784 (Stevens v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Middleton v. State
721 So. 2d 792 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Wright v. State
834 So. 2d 879 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Cook v. State
816 So. 2d 773 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
McCall v. State
862 So. 2d 807 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
LaMar v. State
823 So. 2d 231 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)