Stevens v. Somerset Bus Co.
This text of 140 A. 922 (Stevens v. Somerset Bus Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
These three eases were tried together. They all arose out of injuries received by the respective female plaintiffs, who *450 were passengers in a bus of the Somerset Bus Company, in a collision between that bus and a truck belonging to Hearn & Son, Incorporated, the other defendant. The trial resulted in verdicts against both defendants for each of the plaintiffs, and the former have appealed from the judgments entered thereon.
Our consideration of the several grounds for reversal argued by the counsel of the appellants leads us to the conclusion that in no one of the rulings or instructions by the trial court which are made the basis of these appeals was there harmful error, and that the questions raised are, none of them, of sufficient legal importance to justify specific discussion.
The judgments under review will be affirmed.
For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Yah Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 15.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
140 A. 922, 104 N.J.L. 449, 19 Gummere 449, 1928 N.J. LEXIS 238, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stevens-v-somerset-bus-co-nj-1928.