Stevens v. . Smart

4 N.C. 83
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided January 5, 1814·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

We are of opinion that the probate and letters testamentary issued in South Carolina are sufficient to enable the plaintiff to sue here. The Constitution of the United States and the act of Congress made to carry it into effect direct us to give "full faith and credit to the records, public acts, and judicial proceedings" of other states. A probate is a judicial act of a court having competent jurisdiction, and, while it remains unrepealed, completely authenticates the right of the executor.

NOTE. — But an administrator cannot maintain a suit here upon letters granted in another State. Anonymous, 13 N.C. 355; Butts v. Price, 1 N.C.; Leake v. Gilchrist, 13 N.C. 73; Nisbet v. Stewart, 19 N.C. 24.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stevens v. . Smart, 4 N.C. 83 (N.C. 1814).

4 N.C. 83 (Stevens v. . Smart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Augustin v. Hess Oil Virgin Islands Corp.
67 V.I. 488 (Superior Court of The Virgin Islands, 2017)
Matter of Will of Lamb
279 S.E.2d 781 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1981)