Stevens v. Rollins
34 Me. 226
Opinion
The opinion of the Court, Shepley, C. J., Tenney, Howard, Rice and Appleton, J. J., was delivered by
orally. — William Stevens sues as surviving [227]*227partner. The action then is to be considered as brought by the firm. Before a recovery can be had, it must be proved, that the firm paid the bill.
But the instruction allowed a recovery, if William alone paid it upon his individual account. That was erroneous.
Exceptions sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stevens v. Rollins, 34 Me. 226 (Me. 1852).
34 Me. 226 (Stevens v. Rollins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.