Stevens v. Rollins

34 Me. 226
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided July 1, 1852·Published

Opinion

The opinion of the Court, Shepley, C. J., Tenney, Howard, Rice and Appleton, J. J., was delivered by

Tenney, J.,

orally. — William Stevens sues as surviving [227]*227partner. The action then is to be considered as brought by the firm. Before a recovery can be had, it must be proved, that the firm paid the bill.

Evans, for the defendant. Whitmore, for the plaintiff.

But the instruction allowed a recovery, if William alone paid it upon his individual account. That was erroneous.

Exceptions sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stevens v. Rollins, 34 Me. 226 (Me. 1852).

34 Me. 226 (Stevens v. Rollins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.