Stevens v. Rayon Industries Corp.

169 A. 717, 115 N.J. Eq. 92, 14 Backes 92, 1934 N.J. Ch. LEXIS 174
CourtNew Jersey Court of Chancery
DecidedJanuary 4, 1934
StatusPublished

This text of 169 A. 717 (Stevens v. Rayon Industries Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stevens v. Rayon Industries Corp., 169 A. 717, 115 N.J. Eq. 92, 14 Backes 92, 1934 N.J. Ch. LEXIS 174 (N.J. Ct. App. 1934).

Opinion

The bill of complaint is filed under the New Jersey Securities act. Rayon Industries Corporation is a Delaware corporation organized May 20th, 1933, with a capitalization of one million shares of class A stock, par value $1, and five hundred thousand shares of class B stock, par value $1.

At the first meeting of the board of directors on May 29th, 1933, Simon Levin, one of its members, and the president of the corporation, made an offer, dated May 24th, 1933, which was accepted to sell the corporation forty-eight and a half per cent. of the stock of Norfolk Weavers, Incorporated, a Virginia corporation, together with all of the stock of College Weavers, Incorporated, and College Throwsters, Incorporated (Massachusetts corporations), Beldray Industries Corporation and Beldray Thowsters, Incorporated (Michigan corporations), and S. Levin Company, a New York corporation. By the terms of the offer Simon Levin was to receive five hundred thousand (500,000) shares each of the class A and B stock, $150,000 in cash, and a three years' employment contract *Page 94 as general manager at $25,000 per year, with an option of renewal for two years. Later a change was made whereby Levin gave back the five hundred thousand shares of class A stock and in lieu of the $150,000 in cash agreed to be paid to him, accepted seventy-five thousand shares of class a treasury stock.

In 1931, while industry generally was in the throes of a business depression, an idle plant at Norfolk, Virginia, was brought to the attention of Levin and he negotiated for the purchase of the plant, formed Norfolk Weavers, Incorporated, and interested local capital in the enterprise. Shortly the plant, under his management, employed upwards of three hundred employes and was operating day and night. Between the time of the organization of the plant and its subsequent sale to the Rayon Industries Corporation, the Norfolk Weavers, Incorporated, paid in dividends to the Norfolk interests upwards of $100,000, or at the rate of four hundred per cent. on an investment of $25,000. He next acquired a plant (College Weavers, Incorporated) in the early part of 1931, located at Northampton, Massachusetts. Later, in connection with the operation of the Northampton plant, he leased a throwing plant at Haydenville, Massachusetts, and another at Florence, Massachusetts (both of which last two plants are being leased by College Throwsters, Incorporated). College Weavers, Incorporated, was organized March 11th, 1932, and College Throwsters, Incorporated, in August, 1932, both in Massachusetts. Both plants soon operated at full capacity day and night, the one employing approximately five hundred and fifty people, and the other about eighty people. S. Levin Company, while not incorporated until June, 1933, had been an operating organization for years, buying and selling profitably on a commission and had between seventy-five and one hundred contracts for the production and sale of rayon. Levin testified the demand was so great that he could not meet it.

Also at the first meeting of the board of directors, the defendants Vance and his corporation, the First Continental Corporation, offered to sell to the Rayon Industries Corporation, *Page 95 Belding-Hemingway mills numbers 1, 2 and 3, at Belding, Michigan, and Haydenville mill number 13, at Haydenville, Massachusetts, and the Norfolk real estate; the first plant subject to a lease held by Simon Levin, dated January 18th, 1933; the second subject to a lease held by Levin dated January 18th, 1932; and the third subject to a lease held by College Throwsters, Incorporated. In addition to the real estate and machinery, the offer included the remaining fifty-one and a half per cent. of the stock of Norfolk Weavers, Incorporated. The real estate was subject to mortgages aggregating $155,000. In exchange for the real estate and stock, the offer contemplated the issuance to the First Continental Corporation of five hundred thousand shares of Rayon Industries Corporation class A stock, par value $1 a share, and it was accepted. The actual cash investment of the First Continental Corporation in the properties and stock was $83,750. The properties thus conveyed were appraised at depreciated values at $676,180. This valuation does not take into consideration the value of the fifty-one and a half per cent. of the stock of Norfolk Weavers, Incorporated, which represented control of that company, and upon which as hereinbefore stated there had been paid in dividends over a short period of time upwards of $100,000, or a return of four hundred per cent. on an original investment of $25,000.

Complainant contends that Levin's investment in the properties of the various corporations whose stock was the subject-matter of the sale to the Rayon Industries Corporation, was not more than $131,000, and that the difference between that amount and the $575,000 of the par value of the stock of Rayon Industries Corporation which he received constitutes a secret undisclosed profit obtained by a promoter at the expense of the corporation, and charges that the other members of the board of directors, Donovan, Hecht and Wilson, were merely "dummies." The uncontradicted proof, however, by Levin and two of the other directors is that Levin made full and complete disclosure of all of the facts and details of the transaction, and the charge is not sustained. The properties transferred by Levin to the corporation were *Page 96 appraised by Ford, Bacon and Davis, appraisal engineers of high repute, at a reproduction cost of $2,194,720, as of the date of the sale, and after depreciation at $1,562,430. Under our decisions a promoter may purchase property on his own account for any price he can, with the intention of selling it at a higher price to a company formed or to be formed and sell to that company at a profit, so long as he does so fairly. (Italics mine.) Plaquemines Tropical Fruit Co. v. Buck, 52 N.J. Eq. 219. Under such circumstances no rule of law or equity prohibits such profits. Bigelow v. Old Dominion Copper Mining andSmelting Co., 74 N.J. Eq. 457; Allenhurst Park Estates, Inc., v.Smith, 101 N.J. Eq. 581. In 1 Thompson on Corporations (3ded.) § 123 (at p. 152), the author says, "and where promoters formed a syndicate for acquiring and working a gold mine for their own profit; and sometime thereafter, for the purpose of acquiring additional capital, they organized a corporation and sold their mine to it, it was held that they were not placed in any fiduciary relation at the time of the original agreement to the corporation which they subsequently promoted. Where no fiduciary relation exists the mere suppression by a promoter of the amount of profit being made by him on a sale does not amount to a fraud. Where a person purchased and paid for land, and thereafter organized a corporation, to which he offered to sell such land, it was held that he did not thereby stand in any fiduciary relation to the subscribers to the capital stock." English and American cases are cited in support of the statement.

Levin had been actively engaged in the manufacture of rayon and kindred lines long before the acquisition of some of the properties in question. For nineteen years past he was variously engaged either as salesman, broker or importer of textiles, and finally owner and operator of textile plants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Allenhurst Park Estates v. Smith
138 A. 709 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1927)
Plaquemines Tropical Fruit Co. v. Buck
52 N.J. Eq. 219 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1893)
Bigelow v. Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co.
71 A. 153 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1908)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
169 A. 717, 115 N.J. Eq. 92, 14 Backes 92, 1934 N.J. Ch. LEXIS 174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stevens-v-rayon-industries-corp-njch-1934.