Stevens v. Pennsylvania Railroad

Third Circuit

Stevens v. Pennsylvania Railroad

173 F.2d 221

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedFebruary 21, 1949

DocketNo. 9726

StatusPublished

This text of 173 F.2d 221 (Stevens v. Pennsylvania Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stevens v. Pennsylvania Railroad, 173 F.2d 221 (3d Cir. 1949).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Consideration of the record in this case and of the briefs and oral arguments of the parties convinces us that no substantial error was committed by the trial court. Our conclusion would be otherwise had not the court below instructed the jury to give no consideration to the testimony concerning the fracture of the trochanter. Cf. Moreau v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 3 Cir., 166 F.2d 543. The court, however, adequately charged the jury on this point.

Accordingly the judgment will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Consideration of the record in this case and of the briefs and oral arguments of the parties convinces us that no substantial error was committed by the trial court. Our conclusion would be otherwise had not the court below instructed the jury to give no consideration to the testimony concerning the fracture of the trochanter. Cf. Moreau v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 3 Cir., 166 F.2d 543. The court, however, adequately charged the jury on this point.

Accordingly the judgment will be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

173 F.2d 221, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stevens-v-pennsylvania-railroad-ca3-1949.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack