Stevens v. New York State Thruway Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Stevens v. New York State Thruway Authority

111 A.D.3d 1004, 974 N.Y.S.2d 305

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 7, 2013

StatusPublished

This text of 111 A.D.3d 1004 (Stevens v. New York State Thruway Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stevens v. New York State Thruway Authority, 111 A.D.3d 1004, 974 N.Y.S.2d 305 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

Lahtinen, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (McGrath, J.), entered August 14, 2012 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioners’ application, in a proceeding pursuant to [1005]*1005CPLR article 78, to review a determination of respondent New York State Thruway Authority partially denying petitioners’ Freedom of Information Law requests.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons set forth in our decision in the companion case of Matter of Massaro v New York State Thruway Auth. (Ill AD3d 1001 [2013] [decided herewith]).

Rose, J.E, Spain and Garry, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lahtinen, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (McGrath, J.), entered August 14, 2012 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioners’ application, in a proceeding pursuant to [1005]*1005CPLR article 78, to review a determination of respondent New York State Thruway Authority partially denying petitioners’ Freedom of Information Law requests.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons set forth in our decision in the companion case of Matter of Massaro v New York State Thruway Auth. (Ill AD3d 1001 [2013] [decided herewith]).

Rose, J.E, Spain and Garry, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

111 A.D.3d 1004, 974 N.Y.S.2d 305, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stevens-v-new-york-state-thruway-authority-nyappdiv-2013.