Stevens v. Mechanics' Savings Bank

101 Mass. 109
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedJanuary 15, 1869
StatusPublished
Cited by27 cases

This text of 101 Mass. 109 (Stevens v. Mechanics' Savings Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stevens v. Mechanics' Savings Bank, 101 Mass. 109 (Mass. 1869).

Opinion

Gray, J.

That an assignee under the bankrupt laws of the United States might sue in his own name in the courts of this Commonwealth, to enforce theerights of property vested in him by the assignment in bankruptcy, was expressly adjudged in Ward v. Jenkins, 10 Met. 583; and the objection, made at the trial, that the courts of the United States had exclusive jurisdiction of such an action, was waived at the argument.

The notice that a warrant in bankruptcy had been issued, and that the payment of any debts to the bankrupt was forbidden by law, having been published as required by the act of congress of 1867, c. 176, § 11, and the warrant issued under it, was binding upon all persons, whether they had or had not actual knowledge thereof; and the subsequent payment by the defendants to the bankrupt did not discharge the debt, and affords them no greater protection than if it had been made to any other person not authorized to receive it, as against the assignee in bankruptcy, whose title under the assignment of a later date related back to the commencement of the proceedings in bankruptcy. U. S. St. 1867, c. 176, §§ 11, 14.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hough v. City of North Adams
82 N.E. 46 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1907)
Elmore v. Symonds
67 N.E. 314 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1903)
Palmer v. Jordan
40 N.E. 110 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1895)
Fuller v. Pease
11 N.E. 694 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1887)
Platt v. . Jones
96 N.Y. 24 (New York Court of Appeals, 1884)
Wooldridge v. F. Rickert & Co.
33 La. Ann. 234 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1881)
Mayhew v. Pentecost
129 Mass. 332 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1880)
Wiley v. Pavey
61 Ind. 457 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1878)
Sherwood v. Burns
58 Ind. 502 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1877)
Smith v. Kinney
6 Neb. 447 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1877)
Claflin v. Houseman
93 U.S. 130 (Supreme Court, 1876)
Thornton v. Hogan
63 Mo. 143 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1876)
Tinker v. Van Dyke
23 F. Cas. 1297 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan, 1876)
Russell v. Owen
61 Mo. 185 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1875)
Isett v. Stuart
80 Ill. 404 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1875)
Thomas v. Jones
39 Wis. 124 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1875)
Platt v. Parker
6 Thomp. & Cook 377 (New York Supreme Court, 1875)
Jordan v. Downey
40 Md. 401 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1874)
Gindrat v. Dane
10 F. Cas. 434 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts, 1874)
Rison v. Powell
28 Ark. 427 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1873)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
101 Mass. 109, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stevens-v-mechanics-savings-bank-mass-1869.