Stevens v. Manchester

63 N.H. 390
CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire
DecidedJune 5, 1885
StatusPublished

This text of 63 N.H. 390 (Stevens v. Manchester) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stevens v. Manchester, 63 N.H. 390 (N.H. 1885).

Opinion

Allen, J.

The statute authorizing cities and towns to take land, when it cannot be obtained by purchase at a reasonable price, for the establishment and enlargement of public cemeteries, provides that no cemetery shall be laid out within twenty rods of any dwelling-house without consent of the owner. G. L., c. 49, s.'2. The cemetery may be established by the purchase of land for that purpose, as well as by taking it by the exercise of the right of eminent domain. The mischief sought to be restrained by the limitation in the statute to a distance of twenty rods from a dwelling-house affects all public cemeteries alike, whether established by voluntary or compulsory purchase of the land. It is the public right of purchasing or taking land for a public purpose that is restrained by the limitation in the statute, and not the exercise of the private right of purchasing land for a private cemetery, or any other private purpose. Carter v. Moulton, 58 N. H. 64.

Demurrer overruled.

Bingham, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Carter v. Moulton
58 N.H. 64 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1877)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
63 N.H. 390, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stevens-v-manchester-nh-1885.