Stevens v. Jackson

31 A.3d 656, 612 Pa. 485, 2011 Pa. LEXIS 2700
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 9, 2011·No. 340 MAL 2011·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 9th day of November, 2011, Petitioners’ Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, and the Superior Court’s order quashing Petitioners’ appeal is VACATED. This matter is REMANDED for the Superior Court to consider the substance of Petitioners’ appeal. Estoppel is at issue in this case. The fact that genetic testing has occurred has not mooted out that issue; genetic testing does not resolve estoppel issues, and the estoppel issue is still being contested by the parties. Estoppel issues arising in paternity testing cases are immediately appealable. See Jones v. Trojak, 535 Pa. 95, 634 A.2d 201 (1993) and Freedman v. McCandless, 539 Pa. 584, 654 A.2d 529 (1995). Under this authority, parties are not constrained to wait until they file an appeal regarding a custody order to raise an estoppel argument.

Jurisdiction relinquished.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stevens v. Jackson, 31 A.3d 656, 612 Pa. 485, 2011 Pa. LEXIS 2700 (Pa. 2011).

31 A.3d 656 (Stevens v. Jackson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Freedman v. McCandless
654 A.2d 529 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1995)
Jones v. Trojak
634 A.2d 201 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1993)