Stevens v. Fraser

205 N.W. 622, 53 N.D. 228, 1925 N.D. LEXIS 69

• Court: North Dakota Supreme Court
• Decided: October 8, 1925
• Status: Published

Opinion

JOHNSON, J.

Plaintiff applied for a writ of mandamus directing the defendants to allow and pay a claim under the Soldier’s Bonus Law. The facts are not in dispute. Petitioner came to North Dakota in 1915, at the age of seventeen. His parents at all times resided in Minnesota. He worked in this state until April, 1917, when he em listed in the United States Army. He served during the war and was honorably discharged in March, 1919. He filed a claim for a bonus pursuant to chapter 206, Sess.' Laws, 1919, but the Adjutant General disallowed it on the ground that the claimant was not a “resident” of the state at tbe time of bis enlistment within the definition of section 2 of the Act.

Section 2, chapter 206, Soss. Laws, 1919, as it is re-enacted in chapter 103, Sess. Laws, 1921, reads:

“The term 'returned soldier/ as used in this act, shall include any citizen of this state who has been honorably discharged from the military or naval service of the United States, or any citizen of this state who has been engaged or associated with either the military or naval forces of any of the governments associated with the United States government in the present war and who has been honorably discharged from such service. The term 'any citizen/ as used in this act shall include any person who at the time of enlistment or induction into any such military or naval service was a resident of the State of North Dakota.”

Section 14, Comp. Laws, 1913, so far as material, provides:

“Every person has in law a residence. In determining the place ol residence the following rules are to be observed:

1. It is the place where one remains when not called elsewhere for labor or other special or temporary purposes, and to which he returns in seasons of repose;

2. There can be only one residence;

4. The residence of the father during his life, and after his death the residence of the mother, while she remains unmarried, is the residence of the unmarried minor children;

5. The residence of the husband is presumptively the residence of the wife;

6. The residence of an unmarried minor who has a parent living cannot be changed by either his own act or that of his guardian.”

No valid reason has been suggested for holding that the legislature in using the terms “citizen” and “resident” in the Bonus Act, did not intend that any question pertaining to the right of a minor to the bonus, who enlisted in or was inducted into the service of the government from this state, should be answered by reference to sections 13 and 14, supra, in every case where his claim was questioned or disallowed on the ground that the claimant was not, at the time of his enlistment or induction into the service, a “citizen” or “resident” of the state of North Dakota. Clearly tbe claimant was not a citizen of tbis state; nor was be a resident thereof.

Tbe judgment refusing tbe writ is affirmed.

ChRxstiaNSON, Ob. J., and Birdzell, Buree, and Nuessle, JJ., concur.