Stevens v. Enterprise Developers

441 So. 2d 184, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24269
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 23, 1983
DocketNo. 83-494
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 441 So. 2d 184 (Stevens v. Enterprise Developers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stevens v. Enterprise Developers, 441 So. 2d 184, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24269 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Opinion

BERANEK, Judge.

Appellant, Stevens, was held in contempt. He was also ordered to pay $3,000 toward the attorneys’ fees of the opposing parties as a sanction for his admitted conduct which the trial court found to be in direct violation of a prior judgment in the case. We reverse the finding of contempt in that appellant was not given appropriate notice of the court’s intention or the adverse parties’ desire to hold him in contempt. We remand this matter to the trial court with leave to any party or the court to proceed against appellant for contempt if so desired. This reversal is based solely on procedural errors and is not an indication that appellant’s conduct was not contemptous. The appellant has not raised or argued the separate imposition of the $3,000 sanction regarding attorneys’ fees and same is thus affirmed.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; AND REMANDED.

DOWNEY and HERSEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hoffman v. Hoffman
718 So. 2d 371 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Tschapek v. Frailing
699 So. 2d 851 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
441 So. 2d 184, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24269, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stevens-v-enterprise-developers-fladistctapp-1983.