Stevens v. Effler

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedOctober 5, 2009
Docket09-1633
StatusUnpublished

This text of Stevens v. Effler (Stevens v. Effler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stevens v. Effler, (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1633

TOMMY LEE STEVENS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

TOM EFFLER, Detective,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:08-cv-00618-H)

Submitted: September 29, 2009 Decided: October 5, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tommy Lee Stevens, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Tommy Lee Stevens appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

dismissing as frivolous his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint

under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the

record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we

dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court.

Stevens v. Effler, No. 5:08-cv-00618-H (E.D.N.C. May 28, 2009).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Stevens v. Effler, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stevens-v-effler-ca4-2009.