Stevens v. Effler
This text of Stevens v. Effler (Stevens v. Effler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1633
TOMMY LEE STEVENS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
TOM EFFLER, Detective,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:08-cv-00618-H)
Submitted: September 29, 2009 Decided: October 5, 2009
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tommy Lee Stevens, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Tommy Lee Stevens appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing as frivolous his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint
under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the
record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we
dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court.
Stevens v. Effler, No. 5:08-cv-00618-H (E.D.N.C. May 28, 2009).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Stevens v. Effler, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stevens-v-effler-ca4-2009.