Stevens v. Dunbar

Indiana Supreme Court

Stevens v. Dunbar

1 Blackf. 56, 1820 Ind. LEXIS 4

CourtIndiana Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 15, 1820

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 1 Blackf. 56 (Stevens v. Dunbar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stevens v. Dunbar, 1 Blackf. 56, 1820 Ind. LEXIS 4 (Ind. 1820).

Pincite

Opinion

HELD, that a judgment in favour of the defendant upon a demurrer to the declaration, is no bar to a subsequent suit for the same cause. Lepping v. Kedgewin, 1 Mod. 207 (1).

Held,, also, that in an action of debt upon a note, the interest ascertained to be due at th^ime of the judgment, ought to be entered as so much in damages; and that the judgment in such case is that the plaintiff recover against the defendant the sum of-dollars in debt, and He sum of-dollars in damages, making in all thé sum of-dollars, together with his costs and charges.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HELD, that a judgment in favour of the defendant upon a demurrer to the declaration, is no bar to a subsequent suit for the same cause. Lepping v. Kedgewin, 1 Mod. 207 (1).

Held,, also, that in an action of debt upon a note, the interest ascertained to be due at th^ime of the judgment, ought to be entered as so much in damages; and that the judgment in such case is that the plaintiff recover against the defendant the sum of-dollars in debt, and He sum of-dollars in damages, making in all thé sum of-dollars, together with his costs and charges.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Blackf. 56, 1820 Ind. LEXIS 4, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stevens-v-dunbar-ind-1820.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack