Stevens v. Coolidge
154 A.D. 884, 138 N.Y.S. 1144
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 15, 1912·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
I dissent on the ground that no lien on the Stock Exchange seat was established; and that, considering the nature of a Stock Exchange s.eat, there was no property to which a lien could' attach.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stevens v. Coolidge, 154 A.D. 884, 138 N.Y.S. 1144 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1912).
154 A.D. 884 (Stevens v. Coolidge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hyney v. Nielsen
286 A.D. 891 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1955)
In Re the Accounting of Gruner
68 N.E.2d 514 (New York Court of Appeals, 1946)