Home/Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma/Stevens v. City of Tulsa

Stevens v. City of Tulsa

1925 OK CR 396, 238 P. 1119, 31 Okla. Crim. 242, 1925 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 412
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedJuly 20, 1925
DocketNo. A-5386.
StatusPublished

This text of 1925 OK CR 396 (Stevens v. City of Tulsa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stevens v. City of Tulsa, 1925 OK CR 396, 238 P. 1119, 31 Okla. Crim. 242, 1925 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 412 (Okla. Ct. App. 1925).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This was a conviction, on information charging a violation of a city ordinance defining vagrancy. The city attorney has confessed error, and asks that the judgment of the municipal court of the City of Tulsa be reversed. An examination of the record discloses that the confession of error is well taken, and for insufficiency of the evidence, and upon authority of the case of Campbell v. State, 31 Okla. Cr. 39, 237 P. 133, the judgment of the municipal court is reversed

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Campbell v. State
1925 OK CR 315 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1925 OK CR 396, 238 P. 1119, 31 Okla. Crim. 242, 1925 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 412, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stevens-v-city-of-tulsa-oklacrimapp-1925.