Stevens v. City of Tulsa
1925 OK CR 396, 238 P. 1119, 31 Okla. Crim. 242, 1925 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 412
Opinion
This was a conviction, on information charging a violation of a city ordinance defining vagrancy. The city attorney has confessed error, and asks that the judgment of the municipal court of the City of Tulsa be reversed. An examination of the record discloses that the confession of error is well taken, and for insufficiency of the evidence, and upon authority of the case of Campbell v. State, 31 Okla. Cr. 39, 237 P. 133, the judgment of the municipal court is reversed
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stevens v. City of Tulsa, 1925 OK CR 396, 238 P. 1119, 31 Okla. Crim. 242, 1925 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 412 (Okla. Ct. App. 1925).
1925 OK CR 396 (Stevens v. City of Tulsa) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Campbell v. State
1925 OK CR 315 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1925)