Stevens v. City of Chicago

48 Ill. 498
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 15, 1868
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 48 Ill. 498 (Stevens v. City of Chicago) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stevens v. City of Chicago, 48 Ill. 498 (Ill. 1868).

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice Breese

delivered the opinion of the Court:

This was an action of debt for a penalty, brought in the police court by the City of Chicago, against Edward Stevens, for keeping a disorderly house in that city. A judgment was recovered against the defendant for fifty dollars, from which he appealed to the superior court, and on trial there before a jury, a verdict was rendered against him for fifty dollars. A motion for a new trial was denied, and judgment entered on the verdict; to reverse which, the defendant appeals to this court.

The judgment must be reversed, on the fourth point made by appellant, and that is, there was no evidence before the jury of any ordinance of the city imposing a penalty for keeping a disorderly house. If there is no law, there can be no transgression.

The judgment must be reversed and the cause remanded.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. Schumilowsky
8 Ill. App. 613 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1881)
Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. Clemens
5 Ill. App. 77 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1880)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
48 Ill. 498, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stevens-v-city-of-chicago-ill-1868.