Stevens v. City of Chicago
This text of 48 Ill. 498 (Stevens v. City of Chicago) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the Court:
This was an action of debt for a penalty, brought in the police court by the City of Chicago, against Edward Stevens, for keeping a disorderly house in that city. A judgment was recovered against the defendant for fifty dollars, from which he appealed to the superior court, and on trial there before a jury, a verdict was rendered against him for fifty dollars. A motion for a new trial was denied, and judgment entered on the verdict; to reverse which, the defendant appeals to this court.
The judgment must be reversed, on the fourth point made by appellant, and that is, there was no evidence before the jury of any ordinance of the city imposing a penalty for keeping a disorderly house. If there is no law, there can be no transgression.
The judgment must be reversed and the cause remanded.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
48 Ill. 498, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stevens-v-city-of-chicago-ill-1868.