Stevens v. Central National Bank

24 N.Y.S. 219, 69 Hun 460, 52 N.Y. St. Rep. 894
New York Supreme Court·Decided May 8, 1893·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

HERRICK, J.

This is an appeal from an order denying a motion to strike out the clause in the decision in the above-entitled action directing judgment perpetually enjoining the sale in the suits by the Central National Bank of Boston et al. against de[226] fendants Hazard, Foster, et al., in the United States circuit court,1 and staying all their proceedings under the judgments rendered in said actions. The learned justice before whom such motion was made has given his reasons for denying the same in an elaborate opinion, in which I concur. I can see no reason for writing another one. The order appealed from should be affirmed, with costs and disbursements. All concur.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stevens v. Central National Bank, 24 N.Y.S. 219, 69 Hun 460, 52 N.Y. St. Rep. 894 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).

24 N.Y.S. 219 (Stevens v. Central National Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Torlotting v. Torlotting
82 Mo. App. 192 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1899)