Stevens v. Brown
4 A. 384, 2 Sadler 540, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 761
This text of 4 A. 384 (Stevens v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Stevens v. Brown, 4 A. 384, 2 Sadler 540, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 761 (Pa. 1886).
Opinion
It is found as a fact that there was not any actual, constructive, legal, or intended fraud in the confession of judgment. Such being the case, its validity cannot be impeached in this contention. It is wholly unlike Forrester v. Hanaway, 82 Pa. 218, in which we held that the facts there proved constituted a. fraud on other creditors.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Forrester v. Hanaway
82 Pa. 218 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1876)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
4 A. 384, 2 Sadler 540, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 761, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stevens-v-brown-pa-1886.