Stevens v. Brown

4 A. 384, 2 Sadler 540, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 761
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 24, 1886·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam:

It is found as a fact that there was not any actual, constructive, legal, or intended fraud in the confession of judgment. Such being the case, its validity cannot be impeached in this contention. It is wholly unlike Forrester v. Hanaway, 82 Pa. 218, in which we held that the facts there proved constituted a. fraud on other creditors.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stevens v. Brown, 4 A. 384, 2 Sadler 540, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 761 (Pa. 1886).

4 A. 384 (Stevens v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Forrester v. Hanaway
82 Pa. 218 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1876)