Stevens v. Brown
This text of 1 Walk. Ch. 41 (Stevens v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In disposing of this motion, it is not necessary to inquire into the validity of the statutory foreclosure. Considering the defendant in the light of a mortgagee, this Court will not prevent him from taking possession of the mortgaged premises. The legal title to lands mortgaged is in the mortgagee, who may at any time after a default in the payment of the mortgage money or any part thereof, if not before, where the mortgage does not provide for the mortgagor’s retaining possession until that time, put the mortgagor out of possession by ejectment
Injunction dissolved.
Subsequent to this decision, on March 8th, 1843, it was enacted by the Legislature of this State, “That no action of ejectment shall hereafter be maintained by a mortgagee, or his assigns or representatives, for tbe recovery of the mortgaged premises, until after a foreclosure of the mortgage, and the time of redemption thereof shall have expired.” Laws 1843, p. 139.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Walk. Ch. 41, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stevens-v-brown-michchanct-1842.