Stevens v. American Bankers Insurance Co. of Florida

676 So. 2d 1367, 21 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 328, 1996 Fla. LEXIS 1246, 1996 WL 400381
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided July 18, 1996·No. No. 85457·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We granted review of Stevens v. American Bankers Insurance Co. of Florida, 651 So.2d 1219 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995), based upon express and direct conflict with the opinion in Smith v. General Accident Insurance Co., 641 So.2d 123 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994). See Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. However, after closer examination of the two cases, we have determined that there is no express and direct conflict. Jurisdiction was therefore improvidently granted and the petition for review is accordingly dismissed.

It is so ordered.

KOGAN, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, GRIMES, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.

NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ALLOWED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stevens v. American Bankers Insurance Co. of Florida, 676 So. 2d 1367, 21 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 328, 1996 Fla. LEXIS 1246, 1996 WL 400381 (Fla. 1996).

676 So. 2d 1367 (Stevens v. American Bankers Insurance Co. of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. General Acc. Ins. Co. of America
641 So. 2d 123 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Stevens v. American Bankers Insurance Co. of Florida
651 So. 2d 1219 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)