STEVEN STRATTON v. CHRISTINA INTOCCIA

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 31, 2022·No. 22-0810·Published

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed August 31, 2022.

________________

No. 3D22-0810 Lower Tribunal No. 19-0290-P ________________

Steven Stratton, et al., Appellants,

vs.

Christina Intoccia, et al., Appellees.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Monroe County, Timothy J. Koenig, Judge.

Clark, Fountain, La Vista, Prather & Littky-Rubin, LLP, and Julie H. Littky-Rubin (West Palm Beach), for appellants.

Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP, and James H. Wyman, for appellees.

Before LOGUE, LINDSEY, and BOKOR, JJ.

ON CONFESSION OF ERROR PER CURIAM.

Appellees (Defendants below) Christina and Louise Intoccia

commendably concede that the trial court erred in dismissing the case

without considering the factors set forth in Kozel v. Ostendorf, 629 So. 2d

817 (Fla. 1993). We accept Appellees’ confession of error, reverse the order

of dismissal, and remand for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

STEVEN STRATTON v. CHRISTINA INTOCCIA, (Fla. Ct. App. 2022).

STEVEN STRATTON v. CHRISTINA INTOCCIA (STEVEN STRATTON v. CHRISTINA INTOCCIA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kozel v. Ostendorf
629 So. 2d 817 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1994)