Steven Romansky v. Superintendent Greene SCI

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Steven Romansky v. Superintendent Greene SCI. Read the opinion of the Court — 933 F.3d 293
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided August 9, 2019·No. 17-1993·Unpublished

Opinion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 17-1993

STEVEN L. ROMANSKY,

Appellant

v.

SUPERINTENDENT GREENE SCI;

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA;

DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PIKE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania (D.C. Civil Action No. 1-09-cv-01472) District Judge: Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo

Argued March 6, 2019

Before: SMITH, Chief Judge, AMBRO, and RESTREPO, Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed August 8, 2019)

ORDER AMENDING PRECEDENTIAL OPINION

AMBRO, Circuit Judge

IT IS NOW ORDERED that the Precedential Opinion in the above case filed August 8, 2019, be amended as follows:

On page 13, second paragraph, line seventeen, replace “counts” with “courts” so that the phrase reads “the Pennsylvania courts imposed separate sentences . . . .”

By the Court, s/ Thomas L. Ambro, Circuit Judge Dated: August 9, 2019 cc: All Counsel of Record

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Steven Romansky v. Superintendent Greene SCI, (3d Cir. 2019).

Steven Romansky v. Superintendent Greene SCI (Steven Romansky v. Superintendent Greene SCI) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.