Steven R. Sayre v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 30, 2017·No. 5D17-249·Published

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

STEVEN RICHARD SAYRE, Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D17-249 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

________________________________/ Opinion filed October 31, 2017

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hernando County, Stephen E. Toner, Jr., Judge.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Kevin R. Holtz, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Carmen F. Corrente, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Capron v. State, 948 So. 2d 954, 958 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007)

(holding that “a sufficient temporal break” allowed offender “to reflect and form a new criminal intent”).

ORFINGER, LAMBERT and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Steven R. Sayre v. State, (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Steven R. Sayre v. State (Steven R. Sayre v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Capron v. State
948 So. 2d 954 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)