Steven Nick Hutson v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 18, 2009
Docket06-08-00227-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Steven Nick Hutson v. State (Steven Nick Hutson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Steven Nick Hutson v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion



In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana



______________________________


No. 06-08-00227-CR
______________________________


STEVEN NICHOLAS HUTSON, Appellant


V.


THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee





On Appeal from the 124th Judicial District Court
Gregg County, Texas
Trial Court No. 36077-B





Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.
Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Steven Nicholas Hutson, appellant, has filed with this Court a motion to dismiss his appeal. The motion is signed by Hutson and by his counsel in compliance with Rule 42.2(a) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a). As authorized by Rule 42.2, we grant the motion.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.



Josh R. Morriss, III

Chief Justice



Date Submitted: February 17, 2009

Date Decided: February 18, 2009



Do Not Publish



ame="7"> 6673





Before Morriss, C.J., Ross and Carter, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter



MEMORANDUM OPINION


            Billy Joe Carmon, Jr., attempts to appeal his conviction for sexual assault of a child. Carmon pled guilty and was sentenced to ten years' imprisonment. Carmon's sentence was imposed September 28, 2005. His notice of appeal was filed November 22, 2005. We received the clerk's record March 15, 2006. The issue before us is whether Carmon timely filed his notice of appeal. We conclude that he did not and dismiss the attempted appeal for want of jurisdiction.

            A timely notice of appeal is necessary to invoke this Court's jurisdiction. Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). Rule 26.2(a) prescribes the time period in which a notice of appeal must be filed by a defendant in order to perfect appeal in a criminal case. A defendant's notice of appeal is timely if filed within thirty days after the day sentence is imposed or suspended in open court, or within ninety days after sentencing if the defendant timely files a motion for new trial. Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a); Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 522. The record does not contain any motion for new trial. The last date Carmon could timely file his notice of appeal was October 28, 2005, thirty days after the day the sentence was imposed in open court. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1). Further, no motion for extension of time was filed in this Court within fifteen days of the last day allowed for filing the notice of appeal.

            Carmon has failed to perfect his appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.



                                                                        Jack Carter

                                                                        Justice

Date Submitted:          March 28, 2006

Date Decided:             March 29, 2006


Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Olivo v. State
918 S.W.2d 519 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Steven Nick Hutson v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steven-nick-hutson-v-state-texapp-2009.