Steven Neal Bogue v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 13, 2002
Docket06-02-00107-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Steven Neal Bogue v. State (Steven Neal Bogue v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Steven Neal Bogue v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion



In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana



______________________________



No. 06-02-00107-CR



STEVEN NEAL BOGUE, Appellant



V.



THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee





On Appeal from the 5th Judicial District Court

Cass County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2001-F-00004





Before Morriss, C.J., Grant and Ross, JJ.

Opinion by Justice Grant



O P I N I O N



Steven Bogue appeals the revocation of his community supervision. Bogue pleaded guilty to felony driving while intoxicated. The trial court suspended the imposition of his sentence and placed him on seven years' community supervision. The State later moved to revoke Bogue's community supervision, alleging he committed six violations of its terms. Bogue pleaded true to three of the State's allegations. The trial court found the allegations true, revoked Bogue's community supervision, and sentenced him to five years' imprisonment. The trial court sentenced Bogue on March 25, 2002.

Bogue did not file a motion for new trial; therefore, his notice of appeal was due by April 24, 2002, or with a proper request for an extension, by May 9, 2002. Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1); 26.3. Bogue filed his pro se Motion to Appeal on May 30, 2002. Therefore, because Bogue did not file a timely notice of appeal, this Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal. Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). (1)



The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.



Ben Z. Grant

Justice



Date Submitted: June 13, 2002

Date Decided: June 13, 2002



Do Not Publish

1. In Olivo, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals noted the denial of a meaningful appeal because of ineffective assistance of counsel is a proper ground for habeas corpus relief. Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 525 n.8 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996); see also Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07 (Vernon Supp. 2002).

s New Roman">Date Decided: August 19, 2008

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Olivo v. State
918 S.W.2d 519 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Steven Neal Bogue v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steven-neal-bogue-v-state-texapp-2002.