Steven Maus v. Brian Toder
This text of 398 F. App'x 174 (Steven Maus v. Brian Toder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Steven M. Maus appeals the district court’s 1 grant of summary judgment in favor of Brian N. Toder and Chestnut & Cambronne, P.A. We affirm.
The dispute giving rise to this action is an attorney’s lien for unpaid attorney fees in the amount of $81,778.93 held by the appellees on Maus’s partnership dissolution trust account. After a state court entered judgment for the lien and the Minnesota Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment, Maus v. Galie, No. A06-1183, 2007 WL 1248160, at *2 (Minn.Ct.App. May 1, 2007), Maus brought this action in federal court seeking an accounting; he also stated claims for usury, breach of fiduciary duty, and an alleged violation of the Truth in Lending Act (TILA), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1601-1667Í. The district court concluded the claim for an accounting was barred by the doctrine of collateral estoppel because of determinations made in the Minnesota state court proceedings; the district court further concluded the claims for usury, breach of fiduciary duty, and the alleged TILA violation either failed on the merits or were time-barred. Maus v. Toder, 681 F.Supp.2d 1007, 1013-19 (D.Minn. 2010).
Having carefully reviewed the record de novo, as well as the parties’ briefs, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court in its thorough and well-reasoned decision. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable Patrick A. Conmy, United States District Judge for the District of North Dakota, sitting in the District of Minnesota.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
398 F. App'x 174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steven-maus-v-brian-toder-ca8-2010.