Steven M. Johnson v. William D. Schaefer, Governor Commissioner Lanham Warden Beshears Captain Burkehart Lieutenant Dennis

73 F.3d 357, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 4167, 1996 WL 2267
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 4, 1996
Docket95-7235
StatusPublished

This text of 73 F.3d 357 (Steven M. Johnson v. William D. Schaefer, Governor Commissioner Lanham Warden Beshears Captain Burkehart Lieutenant Dennis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Steven M. Johnson v. William D. Schaefer, Governor Commissioner Lanham Warden Beshears Captain Burkehart Lieutenant Dennis, 73 F.3d 357, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 4167, 1996 WL 2267 (4th Cir. 1996).

Opinion

73 F.3d 357
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Steven M. JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
William D. SCHAEFER, Governor; Commissioner Lanham; Warden
Beshears; Captain Burkehart; Lieutenant Dennis,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-7235.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 28, 1995.
Decided Jan. 4, 1996.

Steven M. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.

John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General of Maryland, Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaints. We have reviewed the records and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Johnson v. Schaefer, Nos. CA-94-3153-JFM; CA-94-3267-JFM (D.Md. Aug. 1, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
73 F.3d 357, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 4167, 1996 WL 2267, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steven-m-johnson-v-william-d-schaefer-governor-com-ca4-1996.