Steven M. Johnson and Steven M. Johnson, P.C. Dba the Johnson Law Firm v. Mary McKinney

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 27, 2011·No. 02-11-00222-CV·Published

Opinion

02-11-222-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-11-00222-CV

Steven M. Johnson and Steven M. Johnson, P.C. dba The Johnson Law Firm

APPELLANTS

V.

Mary McKinney

APPELLEE

------------

FROM THE 352nd District Court OF Tarrant COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION[1] AND JUDGMENT

We have considered “Appellants' Motion To Dismiss.”  It is the court=s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by appellants, for which let execution issue.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

                                                                             PER CURIAM

PANEL:  MEIER, DAUPHINOT, and GABRIEL, JJ. 

DELIVERED:  October 27, 2011  




[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Steven M. Johnson and Steven M. Johnson, P.C. Dba the Johnson Law Firm v. Mary McKinney, (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Steven M. Johnson and Steven M. Johnson, P.C. Dba the Johnson Law Firm v. Mary McKinney (Steven M. Johnson and Steven M. Johnson, P.C. Dba the Johnson Law Firm v. Mary McKinney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.