Steven Gamble v. State of Florida
This text of Steven Gamble v. State of Florida (Steven Gamble v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed March 11, 2026. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D25-2511 Lower Tribunal No. F96-12914 ________________
Steven Gamble, Appellant,
vs.
State of Florida, Appellee.
An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Lody Jean, Judge.
Steven Gamble, in proper person.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Kayla Heather McNab, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before SCALES, C.J., and LOBREE and GOODEN, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Steinhorst v. State, 636 So. 2d 498, 500 (Fla. 1994) (“By
its own terms, rule 1.540 applies only to civil causes, not to collateral claims
associated with a criminal conviction.”); Bryant v. State, 971 So. 2d 818, 819
(Fla. 3d DCA 2007) (“The defendant was incorrect to file a motion under Rule
1.540 . . . . When such a motion is filed, it is to be treated as if it had been
filed under the correct postconviction rule.”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Steven Gamble v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steven-gamble-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2026.