Steven Gamble v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 11, 2026·No. 3D2025-2511·Published

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed March 11, 2026.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

No. 3D25-2511

Lower Tribunal No. F96-12914

Steven Gamble,

Appellant,

vs.

State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Lody Jean, Judge.

Steven Gamble, in proper person.

James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Kayla Heather McNab, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SCALES, C.J., and LOBREE and GOODEN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Steinhorst v. State, 636 So. 2d 498, 500 (Fla. 1994) (“By its own terms, rule 1.540 applies only to civil causes, not to collateral claims associated with a criminal conviction.”); Bryant v. State, 971 So. 2d 818, 819 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) (“The defendant was incorrect to file a motion under Rule 1.540 . . . . When such a motion is filed, it is to be treated as if it had been filed under the correct postconviction rule.”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Steven Gamble v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2026).

Steven Gamble v. State of Florida (Steven Gamble v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Steinhorst v. State
636 So. 2d 498 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1994)
Bryant v. State
971 So. 2d 818 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)